Kamis, 31 Mei 2012

funny faces for facebook

funny faces for facebook. funny faces for facebook. this
  • funny faces for facebook. this



  • MacLuvin
    Apr 6, 11:18 AM
    I am using a late 2010 MBP, i5, 8GB RAM and I have no lagging issues with launchpad other than a slight delay opening folders. I don't use it much so it is not a noticible issue for me. Apps scroll quickly and I am able to page left or right seamlessly.

    So when you click on the Launchpad icon everything comes up smooth and no delay/lag or doesn't act sluggish? just the opening of folders ?

    There's lag for me launching launchpad and also scrolling through its pages and going/creating folders. However I do believe this will be fixed later on as it can't be that demanding to run OSX LION





    funny faces for facebook. funny faces for facebook.
  • funny faces for facebook.



  • UnreaL
    Sep 7, 01:27 PM
    So who else apart from me has bought one? :D





    funny faces for facebook. #39;Face to Facebook
  • #39;Face to Facebook



  • reel2reel
    Apr 12, 09:53 PM
    Viewer built into the browser now. Weird but makes sense I guess.





    funny faces for facebook. funny faces for facebook.
  • funny faces for facebook.



  • longofest
    Nov 29, 02:10 PM
    Already been done...

    http://www.tuaw.com/2006/01/11/atechs-toilet-paper-dispenser-ipod-dock/

    That is absolutely fantastic!





    funny faces for facebook. funny faces for facebook.
  • funny faces for facebook.



  • Eric5h5
    Aug 6, 09:44 PM
    wow, that's some bold statements by Apple. i'm sure that they'll back them up though

    Nothing they haven't done before. Like the "Redmond, start your photocopiers" thing for Tiger. And Redmond did exactly that, it seems. ;)

    --Eric





    funny faces for facebook. Funny Faces Facebook Picture
  • Funny Faces Facebook Picture



  • N10248
    Mar 24, 01:40 PM
    That's not clever at all. You'd still be stuck with the Intel GPU on the internal screen.

    Not if they redesign the Macbooks so the video signal goes back the other way down the thunderbolt cable and directly to the display.

    Although using a 2GB HD 6970 on a 1280x800 display is a bit silly.





    funny faces for facebook. 12 Photo Humor- Funny faces
  • 12 Photo Humor- Funny faces



  • AppleCode
    Nov 24, 05:32 PM
    http://skincasecover.com/43-84-large/blackberry-curve-8520-8530-silicone-skin-green.jpg
    My Fav Colour





    funny faces for facebook. funny faces for facebook.
  • funny faces for facebook.



  • McScooby
    Sep 6, 09:01 AM
    Does this mean we can expect MB / MBP revisions with a bumped HD?





    funny faces for facebook. that many funny faces made
  • that many funny faces made



  • marksman
    Mar 25, 04:14 PM
    I recall some of the naysayers around here not even a year ago stating that such a device would never be suitable for gaming. And here we are. With HD output to your TV.

    Vision, people. Vision.

    Who would have thought that Apple would be able to start the underpinnings of a mobile console gaming like device, in only its second generation.





    funny faces for facebook. Funny Faces Girls
  • Funny Faces Girls



  • igazza
    Sep 15, 06:59 AM
    5 days 19 hours of talking on my iphone 4 :cool:

    2 dropped calls i can remember





    funny faces for facebook. funny faces for facebook.
  • funny faces for facebook.



  • eliamx
    Sep 6, 07:35 PM
    I hope hope hope that iTMovieStore becomes a super success.... and I hope that Steve will force them into a $9.99-Only model and not that stupid $14.99 hierachy..... they'll have to "submit" after it becomes super successful. haha.

    now seriously, movies here in new york are a blasted $10.50-10.75!!! ridiculous. I remember like "2 weeks ago" when movies were at most 8.75, but then when Star Wars Episode 1 came out and then Episode II, AMC 25 in manhattan suddenly bumped their prices up.....each time. "Oh, cause Star Wars, we must raise prices".

    And, they've kept it ever since. Movies are making huge returns, and yet we have to pay a boat-load of money.. Soon it'll be $15. And you know what, Hollywood is going to pay and so will the theater chains. I hope the online model takes over at high quality. I can see it now, I'll pay $50 for a "rental" ...i won't mind........ when i have a 54" iTunes-DRM-signed code for mass-viewing (This is the future, i think) and i'll have 10 friends over.... it'll be Theater-replacement baby!! Like boxing on PPV.... pay $50 and have 10 friends over. I'd pay.... i am talking about current releases. And, when they are 3 months old... $9.99 to buy. THank you Apple. Now, Do it!

    no more distribution costs. no more manufacturing costs. lower prices. right? Not if Hollywood has their way with ridiculous $19.99 prices... HELLO!! Hello!! that's DVD prices.... for a packaged DVD......!! HELLO!!! McFly!!

    This is why I'm getting into Hollywood myself. I plan to be part of the revolution. Sure I like money just like any other schmoe. But, there is something wrong with everythign right now. Especially since all movies are crap these days.... formulaic and tired. And they want to keep raising the prices!

    Rant over:confused:





    funny faces for facebook. Amanda Seyfried#39;s Funny Faces
  • Amanda Seyfried#39;s Funny Faces



  • mac4lifenyc
    Apr 19, 11:23 AM
    I read through a bunch of these posts and I agree with some of you who think the iPod Classic is the best one, based on capacity alone. But the screen is too small now. I too also like to travel with my entire music library and videos - I never know what I'll be in the mood to listen to or watch. That said, if I could offer advice to Apple, I'd say give us the 160GB or 220GB capacity with an iPod Touch interface. Make it as thick as the current iPod Classic if you have to, but give me a larger screen and the same icon-driven interface of the iPhone and iPod Touch. Keep the price at $249 or $299 even, and I'll wait in line for it.





    funny faces for facebook. funny faces for facebook.
  • funny faces for facebook.



  • strabes
    May 2, 04:38 PM
    I'm just wondering if this is a more thorough way of deleting the app. Like, taking out app support and preferences unlike when you just drag the app into the trash. Does this simply move it to the trash or does it take care of everything in the background?

    I think it is basically making 2 ways to delete an app, which I suppose will be more "user friendly" for people coming to Mac from the iDevices halo. But again, wondering if this actually cleans the apps crap up.

    You'd probably appreciate this app: http://onnati.net/apptrap/





    funny faces for facebook. funny faces for facebook. page
  • funny faces for facebook. page



  • Scarlet Fever
    Aug 29, 09:06 AM
    wheres my media edition mac mini...

    seriously i would be stoked if they released an ULV Mac Mini with a 100GB HDD for all your audio and video needs. Ability to plug a 30" ACD would be nice, as 23" isn't that big for a TV. Built-in eyeTV equivalent, better remote... i want one!





    funny faces for facebook. funny faces for facebook.
  • funny faces for facebook.



  • fiftydollarshoe
    Jan 12, 05:16 PM
    that's a good point. i don't remember if they use key words in their teases. what was the tease for the ipod touch? did it have one and if so, was the word "touch" ever mentioned?


    ohhhh my gawd............ every year there is someone who joins the forum telling us they have all the details for new products...... we all lap it up asking more and more questions..... in the end it proves to be incorrect..... step aside Mormons and Scientologists those who want to believe will believe.... anything....





    funny faces for facebook. funny faces for facebook. good Funny+old+lady+face; good Funny+old+lady+face. FireSokar. Mar 19, 06:58 PM. Simple, play dumb. Claim it was there when you
  • funny faces for facebook. good Funny+old+lady+face; good Funny+old+lady+face. FireSokar. Mar 19, 06:58 PM. Simple, play dumb. Claim it was there when you



  • QuarterSwede
    Apr 10, 04:52 PM
    Have to say, whenever these threads crop up, I'm alway left with the opinion that in the U.S., being able to depress a clutch and move a stick at the same time is seen as some kind of divine talent... :p :p :p
    That's because in the US most of us drive on two types of roads, crowded ones and dead straight ones. Automatics are superior on crowded ones and it doesn't matter on straight ones.





    funny faces for facebook. Reaction Faces Facebook Tag
  • Reaction Faces Facebook Tag



  • rdowns
    Apr 12, 05:51 PM
    I don't think people are pumping it up at all. I personally think that people who can't drive a standard transmission, are just lazy (and that goes for my mother, and her habit of doing her makeup while driving). People only get autos, because they don't want to have to "inconvenience" themselves with pushing down on the clutch and throwing the car into the next gear; because doing so requires them to stop shoving food down their face, or to get of the damn phone. I also hate to hear people moan about how inconvenient a standard transmission is during stop and go traffic; I mean it's not that bad, and I recently took my standard transmission accord to chicago and drove in stop and go traffic for over two hours, and it was not as annoying as some would make it out to be. People are just too willing to sacrifice the fun of driving for convenience.

    -Don


    The more I read the stuff you post, the more I shake my head.





    funny faces for facebook. funny faces for facebook.
  • funny faces for facebook.



  • Barnzee
    Apr 12, 10:22 PM
    only 300? sold





    funny faces for facebook. the facebook funny faces
  • the facebook funny faces



  • karsten
    Mar 24, 01:18 PM
    pleasegodpleasegodpleasegod





    regandarcy
    Apr 19, 11:06 AM
    I can't wait! My G5 iMac has officially died and gone to that big computer desk in the sky. It served me well for 5 years, but it's over. Darn thang won't even turn on anymore. I hear the apple start up chime, but the screen stays black and then the iMac just shuts off. But even if I could fix it, it's so old it can't run the latest OSX or even play HD movies. Yup...it's time to buy a new iMac.

    I'm hoping that the next update sees i7s across the line...even the 21.5" models. I expect thunderbolt too since the MacBook pros got it. Other things on my wish list would be for them to include that rumored flash start up drive as standard....but I'm not holding my breath. It would be great if the 21.5" model got the same ability as the 27" to be used as an external monitor. That way in 5 years or more when it becomes unable to run the latest software, you can still use it as a second monitor. :-)

    I like the 27" features, it's just a tad too big. Actually the rumor about Apple adding a 24" size back to the iMac lineup would be PERFECT. But again...not gonna count on it.





    btallada9870
    Mar 22, 08:53 PM
    Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8F190 Safari/6533.18.5)

    Uh, without the iPod Classic, there would be no iPhone, iPod Nano, iPad, or iTouch. Don't knock down what brought you up!
    Where's the Zune now??? Dead

    you could make the same argument for android. i don't think we'd have anything near the cell phones we have today without apple, but i also didn't really follow the market before then.





    GKThursday
    Jan 12, 01:00 PM
    <Sarcasm>
    Actually I REALLY hopes its both USB and FW. FW will allow me to toss my OS disk in and force my disk driveless Mac to boot from it in FW mode.


    Why not place a FW port where the optical drive is now (i.e. on the right) and then make a super thin optical drive that has a fold out FW plug. No cords to mess with, just fold out and plug in.
    If they wanted, they could even add a small display on top of it that could display a single widget.

    maybe they would even make a PRO and non-PRO version, PRO having multitouch in the display.

    Just thinking out loud. . .
    ~Thursday





    Sladd
    Jan 28, 04:25 AM
    Just ordered some days ago will probaly arrive in the upcoming weeks, Volvo S60R design. (stock picture)

    http://i55.tinypic.com/11guafm.jpg





    diamond.g
    Mar 24, 02:07 PM
    The GPU can do that, no need for CPU. The CPU is just there to tell the GPU what to crunch assuming no FLAGS were thrown regarding a particular DRM-protected data.

    Thunderbolt is just the transmission protocol, there is no actual decode or encode besides what is hard wired at the ports.

    Hmm, maybe we are thinking of two different things. How is this going to maintain a protected path? How would Apple keep us from grabbing the stream as it is being sent to the GPU (to be shown on the screen)? That is the part I am thinking of, that is what HDCP/DPCP is supposed to prevent. If we are sending data down the PCIe side then how is it being protected from snooping?



    Tidak ada komentar:

    Posting Komentar